Multi-tenant architecture, AI features that survive production, deployment pipelines and inference cost control, decisions we've made with our own customers and our own money on the line.
We operate Outlia and Setta as genuine multi-tenant products in production. That changes the advice we give, because we've paid for the mistakes: tenant isolation that leaked, inference bills that scaled faster than revenue, deployments that required a specific person to be awake.
The three things that most often need fixing in an existing SaaS codebase are isolation enforced in application code instead of the database, AI features with no evaluation harness so nobody knows whether a change helped, and a deploy process that discourages shipping.
We'll also tell you when multi-tenant is the wrong architecture for your buyers. Enterprise and regulated customers frequently want their own instance, and per-client deployment is a legitimate answer rather than a downgrade.
One missing filter away from returning another customer's data. It belongs in the database, enforced by row-level security.
Prompt and model changes ship on vibes because there's no harness measuring whether quality moved. Then costs rise and nobody can say why.
If deploying needs a quiet afternoon and a specific engineer, every other decision slows down around it.

Auth, tenant isolation, billing, admin tooling, deployment and the operational work after launch. We've built …

There's a real architectural difference between a product with an AI feature and a product designed around mod…

CI/CD, containerisation, environment separation and rollback. The goal is that shipping stops being a schedule…

Architecture, migration and ongoing cost control, without the over-provisioned enterprise setup that a team yo…
Yes, and it's usually the right first step. An honest audit before anyone commits to a timeline beats a rewrite proposed on incomplete information.
Model routing and caching. Most production workloads have a long tail of simple requests that don't need a frontier model, separating those out is typically the largest single cost lever.
On a retainer, yes. Or we hand over with documentation if you have an in-house team, we'd rather you not be dependent on us.
Tell us what's actually breaking. If we're not the right fit we'll say so on the first call.