Infrastructure sized for what you actually run.
Architecture, migration and ongoing cost control, without the over-provisioned enterprise setup that a team your size will never use and will definitely pay for.
Most companies run infrastructure built for someone else's scale.
There are two common failure modes and they look opposite but cost the same. The first is over-provisioning: an architecture copied from a reference diagram designed for a company fifty times your size, generating monthly spend on capacity you'll never touch. The second is under-provisioning: everything on one box with no backups, which is fine until the day it isn't.
Cloud pricing actively encourages the first. Defaults are generous, idle resources bill silently, and nothing in the console tells you that you're paying for three environments nobody has opened in a year.
Data residency is a live and specific concern in the UAE that generic cloud advice ignores entirely. For regulated work the question 'where does our data physically sit' needs a written answer before a regulator asks, and for the most sensitive workloads the answer needs to be 'inside our own infrastructure'.
We deploy across AWS, Lightsail, Railway and Vercel depending on what the workload needs. We're not a reseller of any of them, so there's no incentive pushing you toward the most expensive option.
How it works, step by step.
Audit what's actually running
Including the environments nobody remembers creating. First audits routinely find meaningful spend on idle resources.
Size to real load
Measured traffic and usage, not a projection or a reference architecture built for a different company.
Decide residency explicitly
UAE region, EU region, or entirely in your own infrastructure, decided against your compliance position and written down.
Migrate with a rollback plan
Off whatever is fragile now, in stages, with a tested way back. Migrations without rollback plans are how weekends disappear.
Test the backups
Configured backups that have never been restored are a hypothesis. We restore one to prove it works.
Set up monitoring that pages a human
Alerting on things that actually matter, tuned so alerts aren't ignored, an alert everyone mutes is worse than none.
Four things people assume this is.
Kubernetes by default
Most teams this size don't need it and pay for the complexity in operational overhead for years.
A single-vendor recommendation
We deploy across four platforms and have no reseller relationship pushing a particular answer.
Migration for its own sake
If your current setup is working and appropriately sized, we'll tell you that and not take the project.
Configured-and-forgotten backups
A backup you haven't restored isn't a backup. We test it.
Concretely, what's delivered.
- Architecture matched to real measured load, not a reference diagram
- Cost audit, idle environments, oversized instances, forgotten storage
- Data residency. UAE or EU regions, or fully in your own infrastructure
- Migration with a tested rollback plan, executed in stages
- Backups that have been restored at least once to prove they work
- Monitoring and alerting tuned so alerts don't get ignored
- Infrastructure documentation so it isn't knowledge in one person's head
- Local inference deployment for workloads that can't send data out
Why we can say this.
Our own products run across AWS, Lightsail, Railway and Vercel. Setta on AWS Lightsail, several products on Railway, front-ends on Vercel, with Docker throughout. These are operating costs we pay ourselves every month, which is a sharper incentive to get sizing right than a client's budget provides.
What this won't do.
- We're not a 24/7 managed NOC. We set up alerting and can be on a retainer, but if you need follow-the-sun on-call, that's a different kind of provider.
- Cost savings aren't guaranteed. If your setup is already sensible we'll say so rather than manufacture a finding.
- Migrations carry risk. We stage them and test rollback, and we won't pretend the risk is zero.
- We don't resell cloud capacity. You hold your own accounts and your own billing relationship, which is better for you and worse for our margin.
Straight answers.
Can you keep our data in the UAE?
Yes. UAE region deployment is available, as is EU. For the most sensitive workloads we run models locally so data never leaves your own infrastructure at all.
We think we're overpaying. Can you check?
Usually yes, and usually we find something, idle environments, oversized instances and forgotten storage are the common three. If your setup is already sensible we'll tell you that instead of inventing a problem.
Do you provide ongoing management?
Yes on a retainer, or we hand over with documentation if you have someone in-house. We're not trying to make you dependent on us.
Do we need Kubernetes?
Almost certainly not. Most teams at this size pay for that complexity in operational overhead for years without getting the benefit it exists to provide.
What if our current provider is fine?
Then stay. Migration for its own sake is expensive and risky, and we'd rather not take a project that doesn't need doing.
Can you help with disaster recovery?
Yes, backup strategy, tested restores and a documented recovery procedure. The testing is the part most setups are missing.
Anqor is a small studio, so you deal with the person who builds it. If this isn't the right fit for your business, I'd rather say so on the first call than sell you something you don't need.
LinkedIn →Send us your cloud bill.
A first-pass cost audit takes under an hour and usually finds something. If it doesn't, that's a useful answer too.